, 2011) The development of A fumigatus biofilms is illustrated

, 2011). The development of A. fumigatus biofilms is illustrated in Fig. 1. The process of A. niger biofilm formation can also be divided into

distinct phases: click here (i) adhesion, which is strongly increased by A. niger spore hydrophobicity, (ii) an initial growth and development phase from spore germination to surface colonization and (iii) a maturation phase, in which biomass density is highly increased with development of an internal channel organization (Gutierrez-Correa & Villena, 2003). These channels appear to allow fluids to pass through, favouring a better mass transfer (Villena & Gutierrez-Correa, 2006; Villena & Gutierrez-Correa, 2007b; Villena et al., 2010). There is also different spatial growth coordination when fungus adheres to the surface. This coordination responds to steric interactions between hypha and tips in contact with surfaces. At short distances, binary interactions (tip–hyphae) involve a local spatial rearrangement, resulting in a slowing down of the tip extension rate and consequently in a control of maximum biomass surface density

(Villena et al., 2010). Very few reports on the molecular biology and functional genomics of Aspergillus biofilms have been published; however, a recent study reported global transcriptional and proteomic biofilm this website specific changes in A. fumigatus (Bruns et al., 2010). Planktonic- Rutecarpine and biofilm-grown mycelium at 24 and 48 h growth was analysed using microarrays and 2D gel electrophoresis. Both biofilm- and time-dependent regulation of many proteins and genes associated with primary metabolism was demonstrated, indicating an energy-dependant developmental stage of young biofilms. Biofilm maturation showed a reduction of metabolic activity and an upregulation of hydrophobins, and proteins involved in the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, such as gliotoxin (Bruns et al., 2010). Specifically, it

was shown that 36 protein spots changed in biofilm mycelium of A. fumigatus in comparison to planktonic mycelium, and 78 protein spots changed significantly during biofilm maturation. Based on FunCat categorization these included – proteins involved in ‘metabolism’, ‘protein with binding function or cofactor requirement’ and ‘cellular transport, transport facilitation and transport routes’. Transcriptional profiling demonstrated that 740 genes were differentially regulated (179 up- and 561 down-regulated) with respect to 24 h biofilm vs. planktonic cells. The up-regulated genes were mainly involved in protein synthesis, metabolism, energy conservation and encoded for proteins with binding function or cofactor requirement.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>