7 fmol; c) relative abundance tests were performed on 1 fmol E. coli PCR amplicon, mixed with human genomic DNA extracted
from whole blood, at decreasing concentrations, from 4%, down to 0.02%; d) LDR experiments on the eight faecal samples were performed on 50 fmol of PCR product. Data analysis All arrays were scanned with ScanArray 5000 scanner (Perkin Elmer Life Sciences, Boston, MA, USA), at 10 μm resolution. In the experiments, the fluorescent images were obtained with different acquisition parameters on both laser power and photo-multiplier gain, in order to avoid saturation. IF were quantitated by ScanArray Express 3.0 software, using the “”Adaptive circle”" option, letting diameters vary from 60 to 300 μm. Barasertib No normalization procedures on the IFs Ro 61-8048 have been performed. To assess whether a probe pair was significantly above the background (i.e. was “”present”" or not), we performed a one-sided t-test (α = 0.01). The criteria was relaxed to α = 0.05 for sensitivity tests. The null distribution was set as the population of “”Blank”" spots (e.g. with no oligonucleotide spotted, n = 6). Two times the standard deviation of pixel intensities of the same spots
was added to obtain a conservative estimate. For each zip-code, we considered the population of the IFs of all the replicates (n = 4) and tested it for being significantly above the null-distribution (H0: μtest = μnull; H1: μtest>μnull). In case one replicate in the test population was below 2.5 times the distribution mean, this was considered an outlier and was discarded from the analyses. We calculated the ratio between the signal intensities of the Exoribonuclease specific probes on the blank Cilengitide ic50 intensity (SNRs) and the ratio between all the other probes and
the blank intensity (SNRns). Clustering Hierarchical clustering of HTF-Microbi.Array profiles was carried out using the statistical software R http://www.r-project.org. The Euclidean distance among sample profiles was calculated and Ward’s method was used for agglomeration. Acknowledgements This work was funded by the Micro(bi)array project of the University of Bologna, Italy. Our thanks to Maria Vurchio for help with administrative issues and to Giada Caredda for the support in the experimental phase. Electronic supplementary material Additional file 1: HTF-Microbi.Array target groups. Phylogenetically related groups target of the HTF-Microbi.Array. (XLS 74 KB) Additional file 2: HTF-Microbi.Array probe list. Table of the 30 designed probe pairs. Sequences (5′ -> 3′) for both DS and CP are reported, as well as major thermodynamic parameters (melting temperature, length, number of degenerated bases). (DOC 78 KB) Additional file 3: Specificity tests of the HTF-Microbi.Array.