But the upper right quadrant—where low-contrast SD is greater than high-contrast SD—is the most populated, and many of the cells in this quadrant lie along the diagonal; their SD ratios changed little during inactivation. To evaluate the overall trend in the plot of Figure 2C, we can compare these data to what the two models for the origin of contrast dependent variability might predict. A thalamic origin predicts that cortical inactivation would have no effect on the SD ratio: the SD ratio would be identical

for intact and inactivated cortex, and all of the points would lie along the diagonal (red). A cortical origin predicts that cortical inactivation would abolish much of the difference in variability between low and high contrast. The SD

ratio would therefore be reduced toward 1, and the points would lie along a horizontal line at 1 (blue). We can test these 5-FU datasheet two predictions statistically. Since the fit to the points in Figure 2C is not significantly different from the diagonal (p = 0.71, paired t test) but was significantly different from a horizontal line at a value of 1 (p < 0.001), the data favor a thalamic origin for contrast-dependent changes in response variability. In addition to the control experiments of Chung and Ferster (1998), five observations confirmed that the electrical stimulus was effective in inactivating the cortex. First, find more mean spiking activity (pooled across all trials) was reduced more than 40-fold to 0.007 spike/trial, and peak spike rates were reduced 30-fold after cortical inactivation. Second, mean Vm responses to high-contrast preferred gratings were smaller after inactivation (52% reduction on average, n = 35), likely from the suppression of intracortical activity. Third, a marked hyperpolarization of Vm was evident immediately following the shock artifact, suggesting that the shock evoked a large inhibitory potential, which is likely one of the mechanisms by which spiking activity is silenced. Fourth, as noted above, Vm variability

immediately following the shock, but before the visual response, was markedly lower than the resting variability. In the time window between 5–10 ms following the shock, the trial-to-trial SD of the membrane 3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase potential was reduced relative to the resting cortex by 39% (p < 0.01, paired t test), pooled across all stimulus types (Figure 2B). Fifth, as observed previously (Finn et al., 2007), the fraction of thalamic inputs to these simple cells was highly correlated to their DC-Null/DC-Pref ratios (Figure S3B). Here, DC-Null and DC-Pref are the mean depolarizations evoked by high-contrast gratings at the null and preferred orientations. Because LGN responses are themselves not tuned to orientation, this ratio for the LGN input to a simple cell should be 1. Conversely, because the spike responses of cortical cells are orientation specific, this ratio for cortical inputs to a simple cell should be 0.