difficile 630Δerm and R20291 to select for the restored ermB retrotransposition-activated marker (RAM) that https://www.selleckchem.com/products/XL184.html signals integration into the genome. DNA was extracted for analysis from colonies, which were phenotypically lincomycin resistant, but thiamphenicol sensitive to indicate loss of the plasmid pMTL007. Potential mutants were verified by PCR, sequencing and Southern blot analysis. Screening of mutants by PCR, sequencing and Southern blot Potential mutants were screened by PCR, sequencing and Southern blot analysis to confirm the chromosomal integration of the intron within the

desired genes and loss of the plasmid pMTL007. Three PCRs were performed to screen putative mutants learn more using the following oligonucleotides (Table 1): i) RAM-F and RAM-R, to screen for loss of the group I intron, which insertionally find more inactivated the ermB RAM prior to chromosomal integration of the group II intron; ii) a gene specific primer

and the group II intron specific EBS universal primer, to screen for insertion of the intron into the desired location in the genome; and iii) gene specific forward and reverse primers that flank the insertion site. Genomic DNA from C. difficile R20291 and 630Δerm, and plasmid DNA from pMTL007 were used as controls for the PCR reactions. PCR reactions were performed with GoTaq ® PCR mix (Promega) in accordance with the manufacturers guidelines. The thermal cycling conditions were as follows: 95°C for 2 min × 1; 95°C for 30 sec, 50°C for Cediranib (AZD2171) 30 sec, 68°C for 8 min × 35 cycles; and 68°C for 10 min × 1. Sequencing was performed across the junction of the gene to intron using gene specific

primers and the EBS universal primer to verify insertion site. Southern blot analyses were performed using Roche DIG-High Prime DNA labelling and detection reagents, in accordance with the manufacturer’s guidelines and visualised using CDP star (Roche). Genomic DNA from wild type and potential mutants was disgested with HindIII alongside plasmid DNA as a positive control. The probe was produced by PCR using SaII-R1 and EBS2 primers (Table 1), designed within the group II intron sequence. Acknowledgements This research was supported from the The Wellcome Trust (grant ref: 080860/C/06/Z). RHB acknowledges support from the BBSRC (CISBIC) and EC-FP7 FloriNASH (P22634). References 1. Bartlett JG: Clostridium difficile : History of its role as an enteric pathogen and the current state of knowledge about the organism. Clin Infect Dis 1994, 18:S265-S272.PubMedCrossRef 2. Kelly CP, LaMont JT: Clostridium difficile infection. Annu Rev Med 1998, 49:375–390.PubMedCrossRef 3. Brazier JS, Raybould R, Patel B, Duckworth G, Pearson A, Charlett A, Duerden BI: Distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Clostridium difficile PCR ribotypes in English hospitals, 2007–08. Euro Surveill 2008.,13(41): 4.