Other communications tools may also include letters from the comm

Other communications tools may also include letters from the committee to public health officials and physicians. Most CTV members are involved in training activities on immunization practices, even though this is not a part of CTV’s mission. The CTV’s recommendations are made public, as well as the reports of its working groups. The validated recommendations are published on the HCSP website and in the special annual issue of the Bulletin épidémiologique hebdomadaire (BEH; a weekly epidemiological bulletin published by INVS). The

minutes from the working group meetings selleck compound and plenary meetings are not made public. In certain cases, a letter RG7420 mouse is sent to the DGS from the CTV Chairman but this letter is not made public either. The vaccination schedule is published in several bulletins, such as the BEH, the CNOM and professional journals. Certain information on vaccines is also disseminated by CNAM, the National Health Insurance Fund. Finally, private companies are permitted to publicize their vaccines. The law no. 2009-879 of the 21st of July 2009 [5] states that companies are authorized to publicize their vaccines and that they must include a minimum number of sentences in all of their advertisements,

which must be written by the CTV and validated by the HCSP and the AFSSAPS. The CTV members communicate among themselves via meetings and e-mails. Working group members communicate via meetings or conference calls. The HCSP intranet

portal, though active, is not currently used as a means of communication among CTV members. The CTV does not share information with other national expert committees. Recently, the CTV and the HCSP had to deal with the influenza pandemic crisis. This experience has clearly demonstrated the credibility of their expertise and the impact of their recommendations. However, among the problems experienced by the CTV was a lack of funding since the scarcity of resources in the Secretariat also limits activities of the committee. Another problem was the lack of truly independent committee members, as it was virtually impossible to recruit members that were 4-Aminobutyrate aminotransferase completely free from links with industry. However, this was balanced by employing strong, evidenced-based decision-making procedures, reducing the risk of influence and the associated loss of credibility. Finally, external expertise was hampered by the limited availability of influenza experts. During the current crisis linked to the pandemic flu, CTV experts have been and remain strongly committed to their home institutions, rendering them somewhat unavailable to examine the majority of issues addressed by the CTV.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>