Phys Rev B 2009, 79:115409.CrossRef 39. Ding Y, Wang Y, Ni J, Shi L, Shi S, Tang W: First principles study of structural, vibrational and electronic properties of graphene-like, MX2 (M=Mo, Nb, W, Ta; X=S, Se, Te) monolayers. Physica B Condens Matter 2011,406(11):2254–2260.CrossRef 40. Ao Z, Li S, Jiang Q: Correlation of the applied

electrical field and CO adsorption/desorption behavior on Al-doped Osimertinib cell line graphene. Solid State Commun 2010,150(13–14):680–683.CrossRef 41. Tang S, Cao Z: Adsorption of nitrogen oxides on selleck inhibitor graphene and graphene oxides: insights from density functional calculations. J Chem Phys 2011,134(4):044710.CrossRef Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Authors’ contributions QY performed the first-principles calculations and drafted the manuscript. ZS and SC participated in the calculation part. JL conceived of the study and helped in writing of the manuscript. All

authors read and approved the final manuscript.”
“Background As superhard (hardness H ≥ 40 GPa) film material, nanocomposite films have been widely investigated in the past decades for use as wear-resistant coatings on tools and mechanical components [1, 2]. Among them, the pseudobinary TiN/SiN x is a representative film due to strong surface segregation of the constituent phases (TiN and SiN x have essentially no solid solubility). Especially, since hardness as high as 80 to 105 GPa was reported by Veprek et al. in 2000 [3], it has attracted much attention from the scientific community. So far the nanostructure and hardening mechanism have been widely

explained by nc-TiN/a-SiN x model proposed by Veprek PI3K inhibitor et al. in 1995 [4], in which equiaxed TiN nanocrystallites (nc-TiN) were embedded in an amorphous SiN x (a-SiN x ) matrix. However, Orotidine 5′-phosphate decarboxylase this model is in dispute due to the lack of direct experimental evidence, which mainly reflects in two aspects. On one hand, whether TiN crystals are transformed from columnar crystals into equiaxed nanocrystallites is disputed, since there was no direct cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy (TEM) observation for the isotropic nature of the TiN grain. On the other hand, whether SiN x phase exists as amorphous state is also disputed, since Veprek et al. [4] suggested SiN x was amorphous because no obvious SiN x Bragg reflections in X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were found, which lacked direct observational evidence so far. Later, based on their high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) observations, Kong et al. [5] reported that TiN were columnar nanocrystals, rather than equiaxed nanocrystals, separated by crystallized SiN x interfacial phases. Hultman et al. [6] suggested that SiN x interfacial phase could be crystalline located around TiN nanocrystals according to their ab initio calculations. However, they did not give direct experimental evidence. In addition, the cross-sectional TEM published by Zhang et al.