Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.”
“Background: Many quality of life instruments assess the amount of paid work in combination with role function at home in the same items and do not specifically assess social support in the workplace. The goal of this study was to obtain women’s views on the relationship between employment and health-related quality of life.
Methods: A focus group and questionnaire study was conducted among 73 women with gynecologic cancer who were employed at diagnosis and 25 people who provided them with psychosocial support.
Results: The women held
a variety of blue collar and white collar jobs at diagnosis. Employment provided a strong sense of accomplishment and a welcome distraction during treatment. The employment see more experience was described as distinct from role Screening Library cell line function at home. No one equated working more hours with better quality of life. Social support at work could be poor at the same time that support from family and
friends grew stronger.
Conclusions: The contribution to their quality of life that cancer survivors feel they receive from employment may not be linearly related to the quantity of their role function in the workplace. Employment-related items could be useful as an adjunct to standard quality of life measures.”
“Background and objective Current methods of diagnosing exacerbations of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) shed little light on their aetiology or pathophysiology. This study aimed to define the inflammatory biomarker profile of subjects with obstructive lung disease and to compare these
with control subjects also with respiratory infections, using exhaled breath condensate (EBC) and induced sputum biomarker analysis. Methods EBC, induced sputum and C-reactive protein were collected from subjects with exacerbations of asthma (n=28), exacerbations of COPD (n=29) and otherwise healthy controls with symptoms of respiratory tract infection (n=28). Subjects were tested again after recovery. EBC and induced sputum were analysed for protein, this website hydrogen peroxide, interferon gamma inducible protein-10 (IP-10), neopterin, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, leukotriene B4 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-. Sputum cell counts and EBC pH were also analysed. Results EBC pH was significantly lower in exacerbation compared with recovery (5.54 0.07 vs 6.04 +/- 0.08; P<0.001). The novel markers IP-10 and neopterin were significantly increased in induced sputum supernatant (pooled groups pre and post exacerbation: IP-10: 188.6 +/- 102.1 vs 5.40 +/- 1.28pg/mL, P=0.006; neopterin: 15.81 +/- 2.50 vs 5.38 +/- 0.45nmol/L, P<0.0001), as was TNF- (137.8 +/- 49.64 vs 71.56 +/- 45.03pg/mL, P=0.018). Few other biomarkers proved significantly different in exacerbation, although C-reactive protein was raised.