Results A total of 63 articles were included in the systematic r

Results. A total of 63 articles were included in the systematic reviews. Evidence was low quality. En bloc resection appeared

to improve both local recurrence and disease free survival in Chordoma and Chondrosarcoma. Radiation therapy had a positive impact on the management of Chordoma and Chondrosarcoma with predictably low side effects. The cohort analysis showed significantly decreased local recurrence for Chordoma (P < 0.0001) and Chondrosarcoma (P < 0.0001) with en bloc RG-7388 research buy resection, and significantly decreased death for both Chordoma (P < 0.0001) and Chondrosarcoma (P = 0.0015) with en bloc resection.

Conclusion. When wide or marginal margins (en bloc) are achieved in surgical resection of chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the spine there is a decrease in local recurrence and mortality. Therefore, en bloc resection should be undertaken for the treatment of chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the spine. Strong Recommendation, Moderate Quality Evidence.

Radiation therapy of at least 60 to 65 Gy equivalents is indicated as an adjuvant treatment for chordoma and chondrosarcoma of the spine when there has been incomplete resection or an intralesional margin. Weak Recommendation, Low Quality Evidence.”
“Background: A multicenter, multi-country randomized controlled trial

(the balANZ study) recently reported that peritonitis rates significantly improved with the use of neutral-pH peritoneal GSK923295 nmr AG-881 dialysis (PD) solutions low in glucose degradation products (“”biocompatible”") compared with standard solutions. The present paper reports a secondary outcome analysis of the balANZ trial with respect to peritonitis microbiology, treatment, and outcomes.

Methods: Adult incident PD patients with residual renal function were randomized to receive either biocompatible or conventional (control) PD solutions for 2 years.

Results: The safety population analysis for peritonitis included 91 patients in each group. The unadjusted geometric mean peritonitis rates in those groups were 0.30

[95% confidence interval (CI): 0.22 to 0.41] episodes per patient-year for the biocompatible group and 0.49 (95% CI: 0.39 to 0.62) episodes per patient-year for the control group [incidence rate ratio (IRR): 0.61; 95% CI: 0.41 to 0.90; p = 0.01]. When specific causative organisms were examined, the rates of culture-negative, gram-positive, gram-negative, and polymicrobial peritonitis episodes were not significantly different between the biocompatible and control groups, although the biocompatible group did experience a significantly lower rate of non-pseudomonal gram-negative peritonitis (IRR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.92; p = 0.03). Initial empiric antibiotic regimens were comparable between the groups. Biocompatible fluid use did not significantly reduce the risk of peritonitis-associated hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.48 to 1.

Comments are closed.