The distribution of the sialic acid-specific SSS transporter genes is interesting as they form the only group of bacterial sialic acid transporter genes that are widespread in both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. While no member from Gram-positive bacteria has been

experimentally characterized as yet, in S. aureus and C. perfringens, they are the only genes encoding sialic acid transporters of the described families and may thus be the sole route for sialic acid uptake in these organisms. The physiological function of sialic acid transport in STm has not yet been defined, but analysis of its genome reveals the presence of all the genes required for sialic acid catabolism in E. coli, where sialic acid is a nutrient Dasatinib datasheet in vivo (Chang et al., 2004), thus suggesting a similar catabolic role in STm. Sodium dependence is a common characteristic of SSS transporters and we demonstrated qualitatively that sodium was indeed required for high activity of STM1128. This bacterium also contains a nanT orthologue in addition to STM1128, whose function has not been studied, but the reason why STm has evolved to use a sodium-coupled in addition to a proton-coupled transporter for sialic acid uptake is not clear. Following our observation of an SSS transporter that recognizes Neu5Ac, there are now five classes of transporters present in bacteria that have been

experimentally characterized as being able to recognize this compound Forskolin datasheet (Vimr & Troy, 1985; Allen et al., 2005; Post et al., 2005; Severi et al., 2005; Brigham et al., 2009; Thompson et al., 2009). While many bacteria have a single transporter from one of these Methane monooxygenase classes, there are now clear examples in silico of bacteria that are very likely to have two different sialic acid transporters from different families, including STm (Table 1), questioning the respective roles of these transporters in

the same organism. We used our complementation system to compare the properties of three of these transporters in vivo. When we examined the apparent Ks for sialic acid uptake for the different transporters, the TRAP transporter did have the highest affinity (Kelly & Thomas, 2001), but this was not significantly different from the other transporters. This was a surprising finding as we expected the SBP-dependent transporter to have a significantly higher affinity. Given that the outer membrane (OM) can rate-limit the passage of small molecules (Nikaido & Vaara, 1985), we introduced in our strains the imp mutation, which is believed to increase the general permeability of the OM (Sampson et al., 1989; Sperandeo et al., 2008), but again we observed no difference among the transporters (data not shown). That the transporters were not distinguished on the basis of apparent Ks could be due to the heterologous nature of expression, for example the lipid composition of the host inner membrane may affect transport function.