tuberculosis strains has been demonstrated as a rapid test with results for both TB identification and RIF resistance in < 2 h in a single tube (Hillemann et al., 2011; Tortoli et al., 2012). The Xpert test endorsed by WHO for the detection of PTB has been evaluated recently to test its utility in 547 EPTB specimens (Vadwai et al., 2011). The sensitivity and

specificity of their Xpert test for TB identification was 81% and 99.6%, respectively, in comparison with a composite reference standard (CRS) made up of smear, culture, clinical findings, ATT follow-up, etc. In addition, their assay correctly identified 98% of phenotypic RIF-resistant cases and 94% of phenotypic RIF-susceptible see more cases (Vadwai et al., 2011). Considering culture as the gold standard,

similar encouraging results have been observed by Hillemann et al. (2011) for TB identification in 512 EPTB specimens. The performance of Xpert assay has also been compared with Cobas TaqMan MTB assay and IS6110 based real-time PCR assay for TB identification in EPTB specimens, and it was found that the Xpert assay exhibited better sensitivity than the other two assays (Causse et al., 2011; Miller et al., 2011). selleck chemical Recently, Tortoli et al. (2012) evaluated the utility of Xpert assay in 1476 EPTB specimens and reported 81.3% sensitivity and 99.8% specificity, considering culture and clinical diagnosis as the gold standard. The high cost of this sophisticated test for the diagnosis of EPTB may be offset in developing countries by the rapid turnaround time similar to that of smear microscopy (< 2 h) with less biohazard risks and minimal training to the technicians (Vadwai et al., 2011; Tortoli et al., 2012). Immuno-PCR (PCR Amplified Immunoassay; I-PCR) is a novel ultrasensitive assay for detecting protein selleck chemicals antigens combining the versatility of ELISA with the sensitivity of NAA by PCR, which leads to at least 103–104 increase in sensitivity over an analogous ELISA (Malou & Raoult, 2011). PCR tests are restricted to the detection of nucleic acid molecules only. However, most natural processes including EPTB infections involve

abundant proteins and other non-nucleic acid molecules in circulation so that the analysis of nucleic acids may be inadequate to fully exploit the biological samples. I-PCR has been used for the detection of proto-oncogenes, cytokines as well as potential viral and bacterial antigens including mycobacterial antigens (Malou & Raoult, 2011; Mehta et al., 2012). Recently, we developed an ultrasensitive I-PCR assay to detect M. tuberculosis-specific RD1 and RD2 antigens [ESAT-6 (Rv3875), CFP-10 (Rv3874), CFP-21 (Rv1984c) and MPT-64 (Rv1980c)] and antibodies to these antigens in biological specimens of both PTB and EPTB patients (Mehta et al., 2012). With this I-PCR assay, we could detect up to 0.1 fg of RD antigens, which was 107 more sensitive than that detected with an analogous ELISA.