Working memory showed a mixed profile. Verbal short-term memory (assessed by subtests designed to probe the putative phonological loop) and verbal working memory (assessed by verbal central executive/attentional working memory subtests) were impaired, even when controlling for language deficits. In contrast, the short-term storage of visual information was spared. Correlation analyses between memory and language measures revealed the following. Working memory did not correlate with language: none of the measures assessing the different components of working memory (verbal short-term

memory, verbal working memory, visual short-term memory) correlated significantly with either lexical or grammatical abilities in either SLI or TD children. In contrast, declarative memory, in particular verbal declarative memory, correlated with lexical abilities in both groups of children. Finally, grammatical abilities PTC124 cell line were associated with procedural memory in the TD children, but this website with verbal (and not visual) declarative memory in the children with SLI. The results suggest the following. Children with SLI have a deficit in procedural memory, even in a non-verbal domain. Declarative memory appears to be spared, both in

the visual domain, and in the verbal domain once working memory and language deficits are accounted for. Working memory is normal in the visual domain, but not in the verbal domain. In both TD and SLI children, lexical abilities are related to declarative memory. In TD children, grammatical abilities are associated significantly with procedural memory, but not declarative memory. In children with SLI, in contrast, grammar is associated significantly with declarative memory, but not procedural memory. These findings are largely consistent with the PDH, which this study was designed to test (Ullman, 2004 and Ullman and Pierpont, Urease 2005). First and foremost, the observed deficits in procedural memory support

the primary (core) prediction of the PDH, that procedural memory is impaired. The results are consistent with previous studies, all of which have also reported impairments at learning in procedural memory, in both verbal and non-verbal domains (see Introduction). The PDH also predicts that working memory impairments may be found in SLI. These are not considered core deficits in the disorder, but are nonetheless likely. The present study replicates previous findings that the short-term storage and processing of verbal information (i.e., verbal short-term and working memory) are impaired in SLI (Introduction), and shows for the first time that these deficits hold even when language problems are held constant. The finding that visual working memory remains spared is also consistent with previous studies (see, Introduction).