Primary efficacy variable was change from baseline in UUI episode

Primary efficacy variable was change from baseline in UUI episodes/week at week 12. Urodynamic assessments at baseline and weeks 12 and 36 included maximum cystometric capacity (MCC) and volume at first involuntary detrusor contraction (IDC). Results: 76.0% of patients had

baseline DO. Changes from baseline in MCC and volume at first IDC with onabotulinumtoxinA >= 100 U were superior to placebo at week 12, generally decreasing by week 36. Significant dose-dependent increases in MCC were observed for all onabotulinumtoxinA doses at week 12, and for 150, 200, and 300 U at week 36. Data suggested a dose-response relationship. At week 12 on diary, 15.9% of placebo and 29.8-57.1% of onabotulinumtoxinA 50-300 U recipients, respectively, did not demonstrate UUI.

OnabotulinumtoxinA doses > 150 U were more commonly associated with post-void residual urine volumes AS1842856 > 200 ml. Conclusions: Improvements in urodynamic parameters and clinical outcomes generally trended together following onabotulinumtoxinA treatment. This therapy improved key urodynamic parameters in patients with idiopathic OAB and UUI, with no differences in outcomes between those with and those without baseline DO. Therefore, successful idiopathic OAB treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA does not appear to be related to pretreatment finding of DO. Neurourol. Urodynam. 30:556-562, 2011. (C) 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.”
“Purpose: To evaluate in vitro (using human hepatoma HepG2 cells) and in vivo (using mouse liver with diethlynitrosamine (DEN)-induced hepatocarcinogenesis) effect of a standardized decoction on the expression of p53 (tumour suppressor) and p21 (cyclin kinase Selleckchem MS-275 inhibitor) genes with the long-term goal of Napabucasin developing the formulation into a globally acceptable therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods: The effect of the decoction on (a) mRNA and (b) protein expression of p53 and p21 genes in HepG2 cells and mouse livers with DEN-induced early

hepatocarcinogenesis were evaluated by (a) reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) and (b) immunohistochemical and Western blot analysis, respectively.

Results: The results demonstrated that the decoction significantly (p < 0.001) enhanced the expression of p53 and p21 genes in a time- and dose-dependent manner in HepG2 cells. A dose of 75 mu g/ml significantly increased p53 mRNA at 24 and 48 h and p21 mRNA at 12, 24, 48 h of incubation with the decoction (p < 0.01). Induction of hepatocarcinogenesis in mice significantly increased hepatic expression of both p53 and p21 compared to distilled water control (p < 0.001), while treatment with the decoction further enhanced expression of both genes in DEN-induced hepatocarcinogenesis (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: Overall, the findings demonstrate that the decoction may mediate its reported antihepatocarcinogenic effect, at least in part, through the modulating activities of genes involved in tumour suppression and cell cycle arrest.

Comments are closed.