The multistability of the global dynamics appears more important than specific model details and can be achieved in various ways. For instance, dynamic node models can be chosen to be intrinsically unstable (Honey et al., 2007) or to become unstable once individual nodes are linked to each other (Deco et al., 2009). The multistability may then be controlled through parameters describing physical network interactions, such as coupling HKI-272 strength, delays, or noise. Noise, in particular, may provide the means for transitions between different multistable cluster synchronization

states (Ghosh et al., 2008), shaping the occurrence of ICMs. The organization of ICMs has been linked to the concept of criticality (Plenz, 2013). Criticality is associated with the phase transition between ordered and chaotic dynamics and characterized

by long-range correlations and power-law distributions, for instance, of the amplitude of activity fluctuations. As shown by human and animal studies, the dynamics of envelope ICMs exhibits these characteristic features (Linkenkaer-Hansen et al., 2001, He et al., 2010, Palva and Palva, 2011 and Tagliazucchi et al., 2012b). Intuitively, criticality represents a useful operating point between disorder, which provides flexibility but lacks structure, and order, with the opposite features. oxyclozanide In this way, critical dynamics may support the multistable exploration of topological features of brain connectivity and enhance information processing capabilities of neuronal networks selleck kinase inhibitor (Bertschinger and Natschläger, 2004). Indeed, in the critical state, the dynamic range of an excitable network is maximized (Kinouchi and Copelli, 2006) and brain networks optimize their response to inputs as well as their information processing ability (Shew and Plenz, 2013). Computational modeling indicates that envelope ICMs arise in the neural dynamics

right at the critical phase transition (Haimovici et al., 2013) or just below it (Deco and Jirsa, 2012), implying an optimal exploration of the structural connectivity by neural dynamics. Conversely, the typical hierarchical modular organization of brain connectivity appears to facilitate critical dynamics (Kaiser and Hilgetag, 2010 and Wang et al., 2011a). Modeling also suggests that, in the case of envelope ICMs, the structural constraints may allow only a small number of dynamic attractors (Deco and Jirsa, 2012). However, the repertoire of envelope ICMs is substantially expanded by phase ICMs that arise at shorter timescales (Figure 6B) (Honey et al., 2007). That is, different frequency-specific networks defined by ICMs might form and coexist within the constraints imposed by slower network dynamics.