Therefore, endogenous potentiation of intra-nRT inhibition is poi

Therefore, endogenous potentiation of intra-nRT inhibition is poised to exert an endogenous antioscillatory seizure-suppressing effect, whereas such potentiation in VB could be disadvantageous. It should be noted, however, that VB neurons are BZ-sensitive, as demonstrated here and

in previous studies (Oh et al., 1995; Peden et al., 2008), although systemic treatment with BZs would influence both nRT and VB inhibition such that activity throughout the circuit would be globally suppressed. Indeed, constitutive activation in nRT was ∼60% of maximal, indicating that although there is a substantial degree of endogenous modulation, there is still an extent of enhancement that can be exploited by exogenous BZs, likely explaining the therapeutic efficacy selleck kinase inhibitor of these drugs. Here, we introduce a methodology combining the “sniffer patch” recording configuration (Isaacson et al., 1993; Allen, 1997; Banks and Pearce, 2000) with laser GABA uncaging, which is used to examine nucleus-specific differences

in endogenous BZ site modulation. The main advantage of this method is that GABA exposure to the patches can be normalized independent of patch placement, so that region-specific differences in modulation of GABAergic signaling can be assessed. JQ1 supplier Combined application of GAT antagonists and FLZ was sufficient to completely block the nRT-dependent potentiation. This potentiation is thus mediated in large part by endozepines, and to a lesser

extent by nucleus-specific differences in rates of GABA uptake, with more robust uptake in VB than in nRT. This is consistent with the postulated role for GATs in removing GABA from VB extracellular space in order Dichloromethane dehalogenase to prevent excessive GABABR activation and oscillatory seizure activity (Beenhakker and Huguenard, 2010). The durations of uncaging responses for both nRT and VB patches are longer than those for spontaneous or evoked IPSCs, in accordance with previous studies on patches from thalamic, hippocampal, and cortical neurons (Galarreta and Hestrin, 1997; Jones and Westbrook, 1997; Banks and Pearce, 2000; Schofield and Huguenard, 2007). Therefore, this appears to be an effect of the pulled patch configuration rather than the use of uncaging to apply GABA. Nevertheless, the application of GABA by laser photolysis replicates the nRT versus VB differences in receptor affinity for GABA and kinetics of IPSC decay (Zhang et al., 1997; Mozrzymas et al., 2007; Schofield and Huguenard, 2007). Potentiation of intra-nRT GABAergic transmission by BZs is capable of exerting powerful antioscillatory effects by reducing synchronization in intra-thalamic networks (Huguenard and Prince, 1994a; Huguenard, 1999; Sohal et al., 2003).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>