These proportions do not differ for either trial period (object:

These proportions do not differ for either trial period (object: χ21 = 0.75, p = 0.37; odor: χ21 = 2.27, p = 0.132). The rank correlation analysis indicated no relationship between the object-related

θ power difference PD-1 inhibitor and the proportion of object-selective neurons recorded from the same tetrode for either trial period (rank correlation, p value for object; object: τ = 0.08, p = 0.43; odor: τ = 0.16, p = 0.15). These analyses indicate that θ is prevalent during all periods of task performance and that θ power in only a minority of tetrodes distinguishes the objects that began the sequence in each trial period. Furthermore, object-selective neurons are observed both in tetrodes where θ power differentiates the objects and those in which it does not in each trial period, indicating that differences in θ power are neither necessary

nor sufficient Romidepsin in vitro for producing object-selective neurons. The present findings reveal that a very large proportion of hippocampal neurons encode each sequential moment in a series of events that compose a distinct repeated experience. Hippocampal neurons fired at a sequence of times during key events that occur reliably at particular moments (the objects and odors), and “time cells” encoded sequential moments during an extended discontiguity between those identifiable events. Many hippocampal neurons encoded specific nonspatial stimuli (the object Urease and odors) as well as behavioral responses (go and nogo). Most impressively, the time cells that were active during the discontiguity between the key events fired differentially depending on how the sequence began, indicating that the ensembles contained information about each specific sequence

during the delays when the ongoing behavioral events and general location are the same for different sequences. Thus, hippocampal neuronal ensembles temporally organize and disambiguate distinct sequences of events that compose specific repeated experiences. The evidence that neurons that fire at particular moments in the delay period are “time cells” parallels the evidence that hippocampal neurons that fire at particular locations in space are “place cells.” Thus, the strongest current evidence for hippocampal place cells is two-fold: (1) place cells provide a spatial signal when other potential influences are removed, as observed in recordings from animals moving in random patterns in an open field (Muller et al., 1987); and (2) the firing patterns of place cells are controlled by spatial cues, such that place cells alter their firing patterns when those cues are changed (Muller and Kubie, 1987). Notably, in addition several experiments have held constant all spatial cues but varied the behavioral or cognitive demands, and the common result is that many place cells “remap,” showing that their spatial firing properties are also dependent on nonspatial variables (Eichenbaum et al., 1999).

, 2005; Nicke et al , 1998; Stoop et al , 1999) This contrasts w

, 2005; Nicke et al., 1998; Stoop et al., 1999). This contrasts with eukaryotic glutamate-gated cation channels, which form as tetramers, and with the large family

see more of pentameric “Cys-loop” receptors (Figure 2) which includes members gated by acetylcholine, glycine, γ-aminobutyric acid, 5-hydroxytryptamine and glutamic acid. TM1 and TM2 both contribute to the function of the P2X pore, but the major pore lining segment is TM2 (Egan et al., 1998; Haines et al., 2001; Jiang et al., 2001; Kracun et al., 2010; Li et al., 2008; Rassendren et al., 1997; Samways et al., 2008). The crystal structure of the zebrafish P2X4 receptor has provided a detailed picture of the atomic anatomy of the receptor (Figure 3A; Hattori and Gouaux, 2012; Kawate OSI-744 et al., 2009). In overall shape, a single P2X receptor subunit resembles a dolphin rising from the ocean surface (the cell membrane). The narrow distal part of the dolphin (the fluke) is formed from the two membrane spanning domains as they run through the cell membrane. The body region, with its

attached fins and flippers, rises and curves over so that the rostral region corresponding to the head and beak run almost parallel to the membrane surface. The three subunits curl around each other on an axis of symmetry projecting as a perpendicular from the cell membrane, enclosing a central space or cavity. The tip of the P2X receptor stands some 70 Å proud of the all cell membrane, its turret formed by loops from each subunit surrounding a central aperture that

is too narrow for hydrated ions to pass (Figure 3). This turret is formed by the upper hairpin of a two-stranded β sheet, the three copies of which form the wall of a slightly widened central cavity as they pass down toward the cell membrane (the upper vestibule). Extending laterally from the upper body is the head region, a relatively poorly conserved tangle of loops and short β strands that is stabilized by three disulfide bonds in mammalian receptors. Three prolines cluster at the central axis, corresponding to P89 of the rat P2X2 receptor, which is highly conserved (all numbering refers to rat P2X2). The surrounding region appears to stabilize the upper body as a “brace” with respect to the movements of the lower body that occur during channel opening. Below P89, the central vestibule widens again, its wall formed by three-stranded β sheets (Figure 3B). This forms the lower body region, and amino acid side chains projecting into the central vestibule give it a strongly acidic surface. The β sheets extend down to join directly to the outer ends of the transmembrane domains and, as they do, lateral portals open between them just above the level of the outer membrane surface (Figure 3A). Facing outward from the β sheets that form the wall of the lower body, some 45 Å from the cell surface, one finds the key residues involved in ATP binding.

While they replicated the finding that photostimulation of Amyg a

While they replicated the finding that photostimulation of Amyg axons in the NAc could support reward-related behaviors (Stuber et al., 2011), in contrast to earlier work from this group, they found that Epigenetic inhibitor illuminating ChR2-expressing PFC neurons could also support ICSS. This discrepancy can be reconciled by several experimental details; Britt

et al. (2012) performed a more robust activation of PFC axons in the NAc by using bilateral stimulation and illumination parameters at a 50% higher frequency and train duration. This difference highlights the importance of titrating optogenetic experimental parameters in much the same way as pharmacological experiments, using light and/or viral “dose-dependent curves. Finally, yet another surprising result emerged from this study with their ability to support ICSS with nonspecific MSN activation (Britt et al., 2012). In the NAc (Lobo et al., 2010), D1 and D2 receptor-expressing cells showed opposing effects on reward-related behaviors. However, PLX4032 in vivo when examining the data from these studies, the degree to which activation of D1 receptor-expressing neurons was positively reinforcing may have overpowered the aversive properties of D2 receptor-expressing neuronal activation in the NAc, leading to a net effect

of positive reinforcement. This finding led Britt et al. (2012) to suggest that perhaps the source of glutamatergic innervation was less important than the bulk amount of glutamate released into the medial shell of the NAc. While this might not be Montelukast Sodium true in physiological settings, where glutamate release is governed by the natural spiking of neurons rather than robust trains at frequencies only seen in bursting pyramidal neurons, Britt et al. (2012) certainly put forth a host of new questions. The subtleties of this study need to be explored, particularly given the

caveats that the Amyg, vHipp, and PFC are all robustly and reciprocally connected to each other. While they may provide direct input to the NAc, further experiments are needed to confirm that monosynaptic input from each of these inputs is sufficient to support reward-related behaviors. An important caveat to note for nearly all optogenetic studies published to date is that the use of cylindrical optical fibers with blunt-cut tips creates a relatively narrow and small cone of light that may not capture all of the axon terminals expressing ChR2—particularly in large structures such as the NAc, which is organized spherically rather than cylindrically. Here, Britt et al. (2012) looked only at the medial shell of the NAc, but other recent studies in the NAc core or lateral shell could have different effects, as recently suggested (Lammel et al., 2012). Another possibility raised by Lammel and colleagues is that multiple distinct experiential qualities could support ICSS, including salience, alertness, motivation, and hedonic pleasure in addition to general reward and reinforcement (Lammel et al., 2011).

, 2008) Notably, XBP1 exerts neuroprotective effects against amy

, 2008). Notably, XBP1 exerts neuroprotective effects against amyloid-β induced neuronal death in a Drosophila model, although here XBP1 overexpression does not affect ER stress per se, but rather the regulation of cytosolic Ca2+ levels upon downregulation of ryanodine receptors ( Casas-Tinto et al., 2011). Likewise, XBP1 Temozolomide molecular weight is upregulated in chemical mouse models of PD, and AAV-mediated XBP1 overexpression in the substantia nigra is neuroprotective in this condition ( Sado et al., 2009). As a

word of caution, however, XBP1 knockdown can also result in decreased load of misfolded proteins and neuroprotection ( Hetz et al., 2009), and CHOP upregulation may not always lead to apoptosis ( Halterman et al., 2010). Accordingly, the outcome of IRE-XBP1 and CHOP pathway activation may

depend on the identity of the affected neurons, on context, and on the specific triggers that induce the UPR. Clearly, the issues raised by the results of this elegant study have important potential implications for our understanding of how axonal dysfunction influences neuronal function, repair, and death under acute and chronic conditions. “
“The evolutionarily preserved neuropeptide oxytocin (OT) is perhaps best known for its role as an important hormonal regulator of mammalian reproductive processes such as cervical softening, uterine contraction, and milk ejection. In addition to these peripheral effects, OT is involved in functions of the central find protocol nervous system. From enhancing

social recognition, pair bonding, and maternal behavior found to reducing stress effects and pain sensitivity, central effects of OT have been demonstrated in many mammalian species (Landgraf and Neumann, 2004). OT strengthens pair bonding in monogamous female prairie voles, whereas blocking OT receptors prevents pair bonding. OT can induce maternal behavior in virgin rats whereas rats selectively bred for strong maternal behavior start to neglect their pups when central OT receptors are pharmacologically blocked. In humans, intranasally applied OT attenuates the stress response induced by public speaking, and OT release during breast-feeding lowers stress hormone levels and elevates mood in mothers (Lee et al., 2009). Interestingly, these anxiolytic effects of OT have been associated with reduced neuronal activation in the amygdala, a key brain structure for anxiety and fear (LeDoux, 2000). The central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA), comprising lateral (CeL) and medial (CeM) subdivisions, mediates acquisition and expression of behavioral as well as autonomic fear responses (Maren and Quirk, 2004). Strong OT receptor expression within the CeL has been reported, and in mice, local application of OT in the CeA results in attenuation of conditioned fear responses (Viviani et al., 2011). However, the way by which OT reaches the CeA to affect fear has remained unclear (Neumann, 2007).

It is important to note that the high G:C content of the C9ORF72

It is important to note that the high G:C content of the C9ORF72 expanded RNA poses technical challenges for RNA FISH probe targeting; as such, it is possible that we are only visualizing a fraction of the actual RNA foci present in the cultures. Nevertheless, this same approach has successfully identified nuclear GC repeats in fragile X diseased tissue (Sellier et al., 2013). Specificity of the FISH probes was confirmed by treatment of cells with MAPK Inhibitor Library concentration RNase A and

DNase I, which reduced and maintained the RNA foci respectively, strongly suggesting that these intranuclear inclusions are comprised of “GGGGCC” RNA and not DNA (Figures 2B and 2C). The C9ORF72 mutation resembles the DM2 mutation, which is caused by

a long CTTG tract in the first intron of the ZNF9 gene that generates Selleckchem Obeticholic Acid a toxic CCUGexp RNA ( Lee and Cooper, 2009 and Udd and Krahe, 2012). In DM2, the intranuclear RNA foci are comprised of the expanded RNA repeat and not the surrounding intronic or exonic regions ( Margolis et al., 2006). Therefore, utilizing dual RNA FISH methodologies, we investigated the composition of the C9ORF72 GGGGCC RNA foci in the iPSNs ( Margolis et al., 2006). To achieve this, we probed control and C9ORF72 iPSNs with a 5′digoxigenin-labeled LNA probe to the GGGGCC repeat and a 5′FAM-labeled LNA probe to sequences upstream (probe 1) or downstream (probes 2–5) of the expanded repeat targeting either C9ORF72 exons or introns ( Figure 2D). This approach allowed us to determine whether the full Isotretinoin C9ORF72 transcript is sequestered into nuclear GGGGCC RNA foci. We did not observe nuclear foci when visualizing FISH probes that target these

sequences. Moreover, the staining pattern of 5′FAM-labeled LNA probes in control non-C9ORF72 iPSNs was similar to C9ORF72 iPSN staining ( Figure 2E, upper panel) and differed from the GGGGCC targeting probes in the C9ORF72 iPSN ( Figure 2E, lower panel), suggesting that C9ORF72 RNA exonic or intronic sequences upstream or downstream of the repeat are not primary components of the nuclear RNA foci ( Figure 2E). The percentage of cells with cytoplasmic foci in C9ORF72 cells was significantly higher than in control fibroblasts and iPSNs, as was the number of cytoplasmic GGGGCC foci per cell (Figures 3A, 3B, and S3B). Moreover, similar cytoplasmic foci could be found in C9ORF72 ALS postmortem motor cortex (Figure 3C). The presence of these cytoplasmic RNA foci suggested that the expanded GGGGCC RNA may undergo non-ATG-initiated translation (RAN) (Ash et al., 2013 and Mori et al., 2013b) resulting in the accumulation of high-molecular-weight cytoplasmic dipeptide protein products, namely, poly-(Gly-Ala), poly-(Gly-Pro), and poly-(Gly-Arg) (Ash et al., 2013), a process similar to microsatellite RNA products in DM1 and spinocerebellar ataxia type 8 (SCA8) (Zu et al., 2011).

, 2006; Walter et al , 2007; Kron et al , 2010; Santos et al , 20

, 2006; Walter et al., 2007; Kron et al., 2010; Santos et al., 2011; Danzer, 2012). Gli1-CreERT2 expression in the neonatal dentate gyrus is restricted to granule cell progenitors, so PTEN deletion in the present study targets that same population of neurons that is implicated in these traditional models of temporal lobe epilepsy. While small in relative number, however, computational modeling studies predict that only 5% of the granule cell population needs to be abnormal

to support seizures Linsitinib clinical trial ( Morgan and Soltesz, 2008). It is notable, therefore, that abnormal granule cell numbers here were well above this threshold, and epilepsy developed rapidly. PTEN deletion reproduced numerous hippocampal granule cell pathologies associated with temporal lobe epilepsy, including mossy fiber sprouting ( Tauck and Nadler, 1985; Nadler, 2003), ectopic granule cells ( Scharfman et al., 2000), hilar basal dendrites ( Ribak et al., 2000), somatic hypertrophy and increased spine density ( Murphy et al., 2011). Mossy fiber sprouting was only present among

a subset of PTEN KO animals with seizures; however, sprouting was strongly correlated with the percentage of PTEN KO cells within the dentate. Taken together, these observations indicate that sprouting is not required for epilepsy in this model, but that greater numbers of KO cells promote more robust sprouting. Moreover, in animals with robust sprouting, roughly found 75% was derived from GFP-negative (PTEN wild-type) cells ( Figure 8). One plausible

interpretation of these findings is Ruxolitinib that animals with more KO cells develop a more severe or earlier onset epilepsy. Repeated seizures can induce mossy fiber sprouting among wild-type granule cells ( Cavazos et al., 1991), so earlier disease onset or more severe disease would be predicted to promote greater mossy fiber sprouting. Technical limitations in recording 24/7 EEG from very young animals precluded us from determining the age at which seizures first appear in these animals, and analysis of data from older animals did not reveal any significant correlations. Nevertheless, the ability to dissociate mossy fiber sprouting and seizures could make this a useful model for future studies of this particular plasticity. In contrast to mossy fiber sprouting, neuronal hypertrophy, basal dendrites, and increases in spine density were present among almost all PTEN KO granule cells regardless of whether the animals developed epilepsy, indicating that these changes could contribute to disease etiology. Recent work suggests that neuronal hypertrophy and increased spine density observed here likely reflect proexcitatory changes in granule cells ( Luikart et al., 2011). In this prior study, PTEN mRNA was targeted in granule cells using a shRNA-lentiviral approach, reducing PTEN levels by about 80%.

Behavior is directed toward or away from particular stimuli, as w

Behavior is directed toward or away from particular stimuli, as well as activities that involve interacting with those stimuli. Organisms seek access to some stimulus conditions (i.e., food, water, sex) and avoid others (i.e., pain, discomfort), in both active and passive selleck ways. Moreover, motivated behavior typically takes place in phases (Table 1). The terminal stage

of motivated behavior, which reflects the direct interaction with the goal stimulus, is commonly referred to as the consummatory phase. The word “consummatory” (Craig, 1918) does not refer to “consumption,” but instead to “consummation,” which means “to complete” or “to finish.” In view of the fact that motivational stimuli usually are available at some physical or psychological distance from the organism, the only way to gain access to these stimuli is to engage in behavior that brings them closer, or makes their occurrence Venetoclax more likely. This phase of motivated behavior often is referred to as “appetitive,” “preparatory,” “instrumental,” “approach,” or “seeking.” Thus, researchers sometimes distinguish between “taking” versus “seeking” of a natural stimulus such as food (e.g.,

Foltin, 2001), or of a drug reinforcer; indeed, the term “drug-seeking behavior” has become a common phrase in the language of psychopharmacology. As discussed below, this set of distinctions (e.g., instrumental versus consummatory or seeking versus

taking) is important for understanding PDK4 the effects of dopaminergic manipulations on motivation for natural stimuli such as food. In addition to “directional” aspects of motivation (i.e., that behavior is directed toward or away from stimuli), motivated behavior also is said to have “activational” aspects (Cofer and Appley, 1964; Salamone, 1988, 2010; Parkinson et al., 2002; Table 1). Because organisms are usually separated from motivational stimuli by a long distance, or by various obstacles or response costs, engaging in instrumental behavior often involves work (e.g., foraging, maze running, lever pressing). Animals must allocate considerable resources toward stimulus-seeking behavior, which therefore can be characterized by substantial effort, i.e., speed, persistence, and high levels of work output. Although the exertion of this effort can at times be relatively brief (e.g., a predator pouncing upon its prey), under many circumstances it must be sustained over long periods of time. Effort-related capabilities are highly adaptive, because in the natural environment survival can depend upon the extent to which an organism overcomes time- or work-related response costs. For these reasons, behavioral activation has been considered a fundamental aspect of motivation for several decades.

5; Figure 1C) or CPP (p = 0 5; Figure 2G) treatment Thus, our da

5; Figure 1C) or CPP (p = 0.5; Figure 2G) treatment. Thus, our data suggest that CaMKII acts downstream of NMDA receptors to enhance local proteasomal activity via phosphorylation of the Rpt6 proteasomal subunit at serine 120. Because interrupting CaMKII binding to the NMDA receptor subunit GluN2B has been shown to decrease spine density (Gambrill and Barria, 2011), we examined whether this interaction

is important for activity- and proteasome-dependent spine growth using GluN2B-L1298A/R1300Q MG-132 price knockin (GluN2B KI) mice (Halt et al., 2012). Both the L1298A and R1300Q mutations reduce GluN2B interaction with CaMKII by over 85% in vitro (Strack et al., 2000), and these two mutations abrogate the activity-dependent increase in NMDA receptor-CaMKII interaction in vivo (Halt et al., 2012). In order to determine whether interaction of CaMKII with GluN2B is necessary for activity- and proteasome-dependent spine outgrowth, we transfected hippocampal

slice cultures from WT and GluN2B KI mice with EGFP and examined the consequences of treatment with bicuculline (30 μM) or lactacystin (10 μM) on rates of spine outgrowth (Figures 4C and 4D). As expected, we found that treatment of WT mouse neurons with bicuculline resulted in a 50% increase in spine outgrowth (150% ± 14%) relative to vehicle-treated WT control neurons (100% ± 10%; p < 0.05; Figure 4D). Remarkably, treatment with bicuculline did not alter outgrowth in GluN2B KI Angiogenesis inhibitor neurons (93% ± 6%) relative Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase to vehicle-treated GluN2B KI controls (100% ± 11%; p = 0.6; Figure 4D). Conversely, treatment with lactacystin reduced spine outgrowth in WT neurons by 69% (31% ± 6%) relative to vehicle-treated WT controls (100% ± 6%; p < 0.001), while GluN2B KI neurons were unaffected by lactacystin treatment (92% ± 12%) as compared to vehicle-treated GluN2B KI controls (100% ± 21%; p = 0.8;

Figure 4D). Thus, we conclude that the interaction between CaMKII and GluN2B is necessary for activity- and proteasome-dependent spinogenesis. Surprisingly, we found that baseline spine outgrowth on GluN2B KI control neurons was not different than that on WT control neurons (Table S1; p = 0.7). We predict that compensatory mechanisms are involved, whereby GluN2B KI mice experience an increase in activity- and proteasome-independent spine outgrowth. To further confirm this possibility, we tested the effect of blocking NMDA receptors with CPP on spine outgrowth in WT and GluN2B KI mice. As expected, we found that treatment with CPP reduced spine outgrowth on neurons from WT mice by 42% (58% ± 9%) relative to vehicle-treated WT control neurons (100% ± 10%, p < 0.05) but had no effect on neurons from GluN2B KI mice (96% ± 12%) relative to vehicle-treated GluN2B KI controls (100 ± 24, p = 0.9; Figure S4). These data support that spine outgrowth on GluN2B KI neurons is both activity and proteasome independent.

Each trial began with a visible light-emitting diode (LED) turnin

Each trial began with a visible light-emitting diode (LED) turning on in the center port. In response to this, rats were trained to place their noses in the center port, and remain there until the LED was turned off. We refer to this period SP600125 as the “nose in center” or “fixation” period, and varied its duration randomly from trial to trial (range: 0.9–1.5 s). During the fixation period, an auditory stimulus, consisting of a periodic train of clicks, was played for 300 ms. Click rates greater than 50 clicks/s indicated that a water reward would be available on the left

port; click rates less than 50 clicks/s indicated that a water reward would be available on the right port. On “memory trials,” the click train was played shortly after the rat placed its nose in the center port, and was followed by a silent delay period before the fixation period ended and the animal was allowed to make its response. On “nonmemory trials,” the click train ended at the same time as the fixation period, and the animal could respond immediately after the end of the stimulus. The two types of trials were randomly interleaved with each other in each session. For animals in behavioral and pharmacological experiments, we also interleaved, across trials within each session, six different click rate values, ranging from easy trials,

with click rates far from 50 clicks/s, to difficult trials, with click rates close to 50 clicks/s. To maximize the number of identically prepared out trials, Selleckchem Torin 1 animals in electrophysiological experiments were presented

with only two click rates, 100 and 25 clicks/s, again randomly interleaved across trials (Figure 1C, filled circles). Here we present data from 25 male Long-Evans rats, five of which were implanted with bilateral FOF cannula for infusions, four of which were implanted with bilateral M1 cannula, and another five of which were implanted with microdrives for tetrode recording. Four of the five tetrode-implanted rats performed memory-guided click rate discrimination, as described in Figure 1. As a preliminary test of the effects of a different class of instruction stimulus, the fifth tetrode-implanted rat was trained on a memory-guided spatial location task, in which the click train rate was always 100 clicks/s, and the rewarded side was indicated by playing the click train from either the left or the right speaker. The behavioral performance and physiological results were similar for the two stimulus classes (i.e., click rate discrimination and location discrimination; see Figure S4 available online), and are reported together in the main text. Rats performed about 300 trials per 1.5 hr session each day, 7 days a week, for 6 months to 1.5 years. After each animal was fully trained, an average of ∼66,000 trials per rat were collected.

, 2003 and Lobel et al , 1998) Although the exact location of th

, 2003 and Lobel et al., 1998). Although the exact location of the human vestibular cortex is still under debate (for review see Guldin and Grüsser, 1998, Lopez et al., 2008 and Lopez and Blanke, 2011), fMRI work consistently identified the vestibular cortex in the parietal operculum (Eickhoff et al., 2006 and Fasold et al., 2002) and the posterior insula (Bucher et al., 1998, Fasold et al., 2002 and Vitte

et al., 1996). Earlier Selleck Vorinostat lesion work also associated vestibular deficits with damage of the posterior insula (Brandt and Dieterich, 1999). Although none of these regions were significantly activated in our fMRI study, the proximity of the present fMRI and lesion TPJ locations to vestibular cortex suggests a potential involvement of vestibular cortex or adjacent multisensory cortex (integrating visual, vestibular, and somatosensory signals) in self-location Birinapant clinical trial and the first-person perspective. Our questionnaire data (Q3) show that participants from both groups self-identified more strongly with

the virtual body when the tactile stroking was applied synchronously with the visual stroking (Aspell et al., 2009 and Lenggenhager et al., 2007). Our fMRI analysis detected an activation in the right middle-inferior temporal cortex that may partly reflect changes in self-identification with the seen virtual body. This activation was found to be partially overlapping with the stereotaxic location of the right extrastriate body area (EBA). Yet, although right EBA activity showed a body-specific difference between synchronous versus asynchronous stimulation

in both groups (Supplemental Information) that are compatible with EBA’s involvement in self-identification, EBA activity in the body/synchronous conditions was not significantly different from those in the control conditions, where no self-identification occurs (Supplemental Information). Accordingly, we are cautious to interpret this activity as related to self-identification, also because related changes concerning self-attribution of a fake or virtual hand (during the rubber hand illusion) were associated with activity increases (not decreases as in our right EBA data) in 4-Aminobutyrate aminotransferase lateral premotor and frontal opercular regions (Ehrsson et al., 2004). We note however, that this finding of a potential implication of right EBA in self-identification with a full body extends previous notions that the EBA is involved in the processing of human bodies (Downing et al., 2001, Grossman and Blake, 2002 and Astafiev et al., 2004) and human body form recognition (Urgesi et al., 2007). The synchrony-related differences in the right EBA activity during the visual presentation of a human body are also of interest as they are concordant with higher consistency (Downing et al., 2001) and selectivity (Downing et al., 2006a and Downing et al., 2006b) of the right versus left EBA. Finally, other studies have revealed the role of the EBA in the perception (Downing et al.